88 Generation Students (Exile): အာဆီယံ၀န္ႀကီးမ်ား ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအေရး ေဆြးေႏြး

Thursday, April 8, 2010

အာဆီယံ၀န္ႀကီးမ်ား ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအေရး ေဆြးေႏြး

အာဆီယံ၀န္ႀကီးမ်ား ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအေရး ေဆြးေႏြး
NEJ/ ၈ ဧၿပီ ၂ဝ၁ဝ

ဗီယက္နမ္ႏိုင္ငံ ဟႏြိဳင္ၿမိဳ႕တြင္ ယေန႔က်င္းပသည့္ (၁၆) ႀကိမ္ေျမာက္ အာဆီယံထိပ္သီး ေဆြးေႏြးပဲြတက္ေရာက္ေနသည့္ ႏိုင္ငံျခားေရး၀န္ႀကီးမ်ားက ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံမွ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲႏွင့္ပတ္သက္၍ ေမးျမန္းေျပာဆိုမႈမ်ား ျပဳလုပ္ၾကေၾကာင္း သိရသည္။

ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ ျပဳလုပ္မည့္ ၂၀၁၀ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲႏွင့္ပတ္သက္၍ အာဆီယံ၀န္ႀကီးမ်ားက ေမးခြန္းထုတ္မႈမ်ားရိွေသာ္လည္း တစုံတရာေ၀ဖန္ေျပာဆိုမႈမ်ဳိးမရိွေၾကာင္း ဟႏိြဳင္မွလာသည့္ ေအအက္ဖ္ပီသတင္းတြင္ ေဖာ္ျပသည္။

ယေန႔ျပဳလုပ္မည့္ ေဆြးေႏြးပြဲမတိုင္မီ ယမန္ေန႔ညေနပိုင္း၌ အာဆီယံႏိုင္ငံမ်ားမွ ႏိုင္ငံျခားေရး၀န္ႀကီးမ်ား ေတြ႔ဆုံရာတြင္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ ျပဳလုပ္မည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲႏွင့္ဆိုင္သည့္ လြတ္လပ္တရားမွ်တမႈကိစၥရပ္မ်ားကို ျမန္မာစစ္အစိုးရ ႏိုင္ငံျခားေရး၀န္ႀကီး ဦးဉာဏ္၀င္းအား ေမးျမန္းခဲ့ၾကသည္ဟု သိရသည္။

စင္ကာပူႏိုင္ငံျခားေရး၀န္ႀကီး မစၥတာ ေဂ်ာ့ယိုးက “က်ေနာ္တုိ႔ သူ႔ကို ဘာလုပ္ရမယ္ဆိုၿပီး ေ၀ဖန္ပို႔ခ် ေျပာဆိုတာေတြ မလုပ္ပါဘူး။ က်ေနာ္တို႔က အေသအခ်ာေလ့လာၿပီး အႀကံဉာဏ္ေတြ ေပးတာပါ။ သူကလည္း လက္ခံနားေထာင္ပါတယ္” ဟု ေျပာသည္။

ေရွ႕လာမည့္ကာလသည္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအတြက္ အေရးႀကီးသည့္ကာလျဖစ္ၿပီး ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံက အျဖစ္အပ်က္မ်ားကို ျမန္မာျပည္သူမ်ားကသာ ဆုံးျဖတ္ရမည္ျဖစ္ေၾကာင္းလည္း ၎က ေျပာၾကားသည္။

အာဆီယံအတြင္းေရးမႉး မစၥတာ စူရမ္ ပစ္စ၀မ္က အာဆီယံအဖြဲ႔ႀကီးအေနျဖင့္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံက ကတိေပးထားသည့္ ဒီမိုကေရစီလမ္းျပေျမပုံအတုိင္း လုိက္နာေဆာင္ရြက္ရန္ တင္ျပေျပာဆိုေနျခင္းသာျဖစ္ၿပီး ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံ၏ လူ႔အခြင့္အေရးခ်ဳိးေဖာက္မႈမွတ္တမ္းမ်ားသည္ အာဆီယံအေပၚ ဆက္လက္ၿခိမ္းေျခာက္ေနဆဲျဖစ္သည္ဟု ေျပာၾကားခဲ့သည္။

ယမန္ေန႔ကလည္း အင္ဒိုနီးရွားႏုိင္ငံျခားေရး၀န္ႀကီး မစၥတာ မာတီ နာတာလီဂါ၀ါက ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ျပဳလုပ္မည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲကို လြတ္လပ္တရားမွ်တသည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲျဖစ္ေစရန္ ျမန္မာစစ္အစိုးရက ျပဳလုပ္သင့္ေၾကာင္း၊ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ကိုလည္း လႊတ္ေပးသင့္ေၾကာင္း သတင္းေထာက္မ်ားကို ေျပာၾကားခဲ့သည္။

ထို႔အျပင္ ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံတြင္ လြတ္လပ္ၿပီးတရားမွ်တသည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲမ်ားအျဖစ္ က်င္းပေပးရန္ စစ္အစိုးရက ပ်က္ကြက္ခဲ့သျဖင့္ အာဆီယံအဖြဲ႔၀င္အျဖစ္က ရပ္ဆိုင္းၿပီး စီးပြားေရးပိတ္ဆို႔အေရးယူမႈမ်ား ေဆာင္ရြက္ရန္ အေရွ႕ေတာင္အာရွႏိုင္ငံမ်ားမွ လႊတ္ေတာ္အမတ္ (၁၀၀) ေက်ာ္ျဖင့္ ဖြဲ႔စည္းထားသည့္ AIPMC ေခၚ ျမန္မာ့အေရး အာဆီယံ လႊတ္ေတာ္အမတ္မ်ားအဖဲြ႔ကလည္း ဧၿပီ (၇) ရက္တြင္ အာဆီယံအဖြဲ႔သို႔ စာေရးသားေတာင္းဆိုခဲ့သည္။

စစ္အစိုးရက ထုတ္ျပန္လိုက္သည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲဆိုင္ရာ ဥပေဒမ်ားအရ က်င္းပမည့္ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲသည္ အမ်ားယုံၾကည္ လက္ခံသည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲမျဖစ္ႏိုင္ေၾကာင္း၊ ထို႔ေၾကာင့္ ေဒၚေအာင္ဆန္းစုၾကည္ႏွင့္ အန္အယ္လ္ဒီပါတီက ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲကို ဆန္႔က်င္လိုက္ၾကျခင္းျဖစ္ေၾကာင္း၊ အာဆီယံအေနျဖင့္ လြတ္လပ္တရားမွ်တသည့္ ေရြးေကာက္ပြဲ ျဖစ္ေျမာက္ေစရန္ ျမန္မာစစ္အစိုးရကို ဖိအားေပးသင့္ေၾကာင္း ေတာင္းဆိုထားသည္။

No comments:

Post a Comment

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"I am disappointed by the unwillingness of the government of Burma to deliver on its promises for democratic dialogue and the release of political prisoners."

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"I would like to make an appeal to President Bush: Please take pride as a President who has worked hard for Burma to achieve something before his term expires.”

-U Gambira, a leader of the All-Burma Monks’ Alliance that spearheaded nationwide protests in Burma in September---

—

U WIN TIN

Because we refuse to bow to these unjust election 'laws,' our party will be abolished by the regime soon. Still, the NLD will not disappear. We will be among the people, with the people. We will continue to fight for democracy, human rights and equality among all ethnic nationalities, by peaceful means. —

Win Tin, a member of NLD Central Executive Committee

From Stalin to Burma, a history lesson

They may wear different cloaks, but under the surface all dictators are similar. As the memory of dictators like Joseph Stalin fades, mistakes of the past repeat themselves with a vengeance in forgotten places like Burma.One writer said of Stalin: “He had found Russia working with wooden ploughs and left it equipped with atomic [stock]piles.” But perhaps the true question doesn’t regard Stalin’s undisputable impact on humanity, but whether the legacy justified all the human sacrifice. To Stalin, the millions killed as a consequence of his ambitious drive were simply stepping stones along the road to national prosperity. However, such a Machiavellian frame of mind can neither be justifiable nor ethical.Stalin utilized numerous harsh methods in attempting to meet his ‘utopian’ goals. Collective farms were prevalent, while each Five Year Plan sought to leapfrog Russia ahead of competing nations and systems. Toward this end, virtually every industry fell under the direct control of the government and its de facto and shackled workforce. And the sad truth, more often than not, was results never met by an increasingly impoverished population.Stalin’s principle instrument for maintaining control over his country was his secret police. Through this institution, fear was instilled in the hearts of the people. The final death toll from Stalin’s regime is indeed staggering, with estimates ranging from 10 to 20 million people having perished.Stalin was under the belief that all his actions, extreme or otherwise, were necessary in order to pull Russia into the industrial age. Yet, ultimately, the major flaw in Stalin’s reasoning was that he claimed all sacrifices were necessary and for the future of Russia. “Life has improved, comrades. Life has become more joyous,” he once remarked. And while he was thinking about the future of the country and the generations to come, the standard of living within Russia had plummeted.Today, forgetting that dictatorship is a self inflicted wound, some intellectuals and humanitarians reason that simply sending more aid and increasing engagement are starting points to improving the political situation in Burma. But when they begin to regard the active opposition, as symbolized by Aung San Suu Kyi, as increasingly irrelevant, the time has come to refresh their memory about Joseph Stalin and the enormous price of dictatorship. It is one thing to want to bring Burma into the international community, but it is another to coddle and nurture tyrants without speaking out against their inhumane acts.So far, newly elected U.S. President Barack Obama and Foreign Secretary Hillary Clinton have taken a cautious and slow approach toward Burma. But in a world of competing interests and ideology, it will be a great tragedy if they fail to take a firm stand against the dictators in Burma.After all, the United States and its allies helped reform the militaries in Indonesia and Turkey within democratic transitions and transformations. Now, the U.S., United Nations, ASEAN and the European Union need decisive and effective leadership to help Burma. Obama and Clinton have a great chance to seize this mantle…if they are willing to seriously take on the leadership role.Today, even as Burma’s generals tragically act more and more like Stalin, could it not be that the army as an institution in Burma was originally inspired by similar beliefs to those of countries such as Indonesia and Turkey? This should offer an important clue as to where to begin with Burma.

88 Generation Students (Exile)

Thursday, April 8, 2010

အာဆီယံ၀န္ႀကီးမ်ား ျမန္မာႏိုင္ငံအေရး ေဆြးေႏြး

No comments:

NeoCounter

ONLINE COUNTER

VISITOR COUNTER

About Me