88 Generation Students (Exile): ဆရာၾကီးေခၚလို ႔ ေစ်းတင္ထားလိုက္တယ္

Saturday, March 20, 2010

ဆရာၾကီးေခၚလို ႔ ေစ်းတင္ထားလိုက္တယ္

က်ေနာ္အခ်ိန္ကာလကုိအတိက်မေၿပာနိဳင္ေတာ႔ေပမဲ႔မွန္းဆမိသေလာက္တြက္ဆၾကည္႔
လၽွင္ ဒုတိယကမာၻစစ္ၾကီးၿပီးသြားသည္႔ေနာက္ပိုင္း အေမရိကန္ႏွင္႔ ဆိုဗီယက္ႏိုင္ငံတို႔ရမယ္ရွာ၍စစ္ၿပဳၾကရန္အေၾကာင္းရွာေနၾကေသာ စစ္ေအးကာလ 1955-60 ၀န္းက်င္ေလာက္က ၿဖစ္ေပလိမ္႔မည္။
ရုရွားေခၚဆိုဗီၤယက္ကတင္းတင္းက်ပ္က်ပ္ကြန္ၿမဴနစ္စနစ္ၿဖင္႔ၿပည္သူၿပည္သားအားလံုးကိုအေၾကာက္တရားေအာက္တြင္ ၿပားၿပား
၀ပ္ေနၾကေလေအာင္တင္းၾကပ္စြာအုပ္ခ်ဳပ္
ထားေသာအာဏာရွင္စတာလင္ရဲ႔အာဏာစက္ကထြန္းလင္းေတာက္ပလြန္းေသာကာလ
အခ်ိန္ခါဟု ဆိုရေပမည္။
မည္သို႔ပင္ အုပ္ခ်ဳပ္ထားေစကာမူ အခ်ိဳ႔ေသာရုရွားၿပည္သူမ်ားသည္ သူတို႔၏ ၿမတ္ႏိုးတန္ဖိုးထားသည္႔ ေနစဥ္ယံုၾကည္မွဳ ဓေလ႔မ်ားကို ဆုပ္ကိုင္ထားၾကေလသည္။
၎တို႔ တန္ဖိုးထားၾကေလေသာ ယံုၾကည္မွဳ ဓေလ႔မ်ားထဲတြင္ မိမိေနထိုင္ၾကသည္႔ အိမ္၌ၾကက္တူေရြးငွက္မ်ားကိုအလွေမြးၿမဴတတ္ၾကေသာဓေလ႔တခုအဓိကပါ၀င္
ပါသည္။
သို႔ၿဖင္႔၍ မိမိတို ႔ ၾကိဳက္ႏွစ္သက္ေသာၾကက္တူေရြးကိုေမြးၾကရန္ အနီးနားတြင္ရွိ ေသာေစ်းထဲ၌ သြားေရာက္၀ယ္ယူေလ႔ရွိၾကသည္။
တေန႔၌ေမာင္ႏွံစံုတြဲတတဲြြသည္မိမိတို႔ႏွစ္သက္ေသာၾကက္တူေရြးတေကာင္ေမြးၿမဴၾကရန္ ၾကက္တူေရြးငွက္မ်ားေရာင္းခ်သည္႔ဆိုင္ရွိရာေစ်းသို ႔သြားေလသည္။
ၾကက္တူေရြးဆိုင္သို႔ေရာက္ၾကေသာအခါဆိုင္ထဲတြင္အၿခားတရိစာၦန္မ်ားႏွင္႔္အရြယ္စားမတူညီေသာ ၾကက္တူေရြးသုံးေကာင္သာရိွေလသည္။
ၾကက္တူေရြးအရြယ္စားမ်ားမွာအေသးငယ္၊အလတ္စားရြယ္ႏွင္႔အေတာ္ပင္ၾကီးရင္႔ေန
ေသာအေကာင္ၾကီးတို႔ၿဖစ္ၾကသည္။
ထိုအခါၾကက္တူေရြး၀ယ္ယူရန္ရိွေသာေမာင္ႏွံကမိမိတို႔တြင္ပါလာေသာေငြအင္းအားႏွင္္႔ခ်ိန္ဆ၍ အငယ္ဆံုးေသာအေကာင္အားလက္ညိဳးထိုးၿပီး ဆိုင္ရွင္ကို ‘‘ဒီအေကာင္ငယ္ေလးက ဘယ္ေလာက္လဲ‘‘ဲ ဟုေမးေလသည္၊ ဆိုင္ရွင္က ‘‘ေဒၚလာတရာ‘‘ ဟုေၿပာသည္။ထိုအခါ၀ယ္သူက‘‘ဘာၿဖစ္လို ႔ေဒၚလာတရာတန္ရသလဲ‘‘ ေမးေသာအခါ ‘‘သူက တစ္ဘာသာေၿပာတတ္တယ္‘‘္ ဟုဆိုင္ရွင္ကၿပန္ေၿဖေလသည္။ ဒါဆိုရင္ ‘‘ဟုိအလတ္စားရြယ္အေကာင္ကေရာ‘‘ ဟု ၀ယ္သူေမာင္ႏွံကေမးၿပန္သည္၊ ‘‘ ေဒၚလာ ၂၀၀ ၊ ႏွစ္ဘာသာေၿပာတတ္တယ္‘‘ ဟု ေရာင္းသူကေၿဖသည္၊ ‘‘ဒါဆိုရင္ ဟိုအၾကီးဆံုးေကာင္ၾကီးကေရာဘယ္ေလာက္လဲ‘‘ ၀ယ္သူေမာင္ႏွံကထပ္ေမးေလသည္။ ဆိုင္ရွင္ကခတ္တိုတိုတုပ္တုပ္ၿဖင္႔ ေဒၚလာသံုးရာ ဟု ေၿပာသည္၊ ၀ယ္သူေမာင္ႏွံကဆိုင္ရွင္အား ‘အုိ ….. အဲဒီေကာင္ၾကီးက ေဒၚလာသံုးရာၾကီးမ်ားေတာင္ သူက စကားဘယ္ႏွစ္မ်ိဳးတတ္သလဲ‘‘ ေမးေသာအခါ ဆိုင္ရွင္သည္ေခါင္းကုတ္၍ ေလသံေလးတြဲတြဲၿဖင္႔ေၿဖလိုက္သည္မွာ
‘‘သူဘာသာဘယ္ႏွစ္မ်ိဳးေၿပာတတ္တာမတတ္တာေတာ႔က်ေနာ္မသိဘူး၊ သူေၿပာတာကိုလဲက်ေနာ္တခါမွမၾကားမိဘူး၊ဒါေပမဲ႔ဟိုုဘာသာစကားတစ္မ်ိဳးနဲ႔ ႏွစ္မ်ိဳးေၿပာတတ္ၾကတဲ႔အေကာင္ေတြက မိုးလင္းကေန မိုးခ်ဳပ္ ဒီအၾကီးဆံုးေကာင္ၾကီးကို ဆရာၾကီး ဆရာၾကီးလို႔ိေခၚေနၾကေတာ႔ က်ေနာ္လဲ ေဒၚလာသံုးရာ ေစ်းတင္ထားလိုက္တယ္။‘‘

မွတ္ခ်က္
စာဖတ္သူမ်ား က်ေနာ္တို႔ ၿမန္မာၿပည္မွ ဗိုလ္သန္းေရႊ တို႔ အဖြဲ႔ကို ယွင္ထိုးစဥ္းစားၾကည္႔နိုင္ပါသသည္

လူသြပ္လူ႐ုိင္း၊ လူ႔႐ုန္႔ထုိင္းတုိ႔၊ ႐ုိင္း႐ုိင္းပင္းပင္း၊ တရားသြင္းလည္း၊ ဘူးနားပင္းတြင္ ေရမ၀င္သုိ႔၊ နားျပင္မၾကား၊ အလြတ္သြား၍၊ ကၽြဲပါးေစာင္းတီး” စသျဖင့္ မန္လည္ဆရာေတာ္သည္ မဃေဒ၀လကၤာသစ္တြင္ ေရးသားခဲ့သည
၀သုန္ေၿမ တင္ၿပသည္

No comments:

Post a Comment

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"I am disappointed by the unwillingness of the government of Burma to deliver on its promises for democratic dialogue and the release of political prisoners."

UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

QUOTE OF THE DAY

"I would like to make an appeal to President Bush: Please take pride as a President who has worked hard for Burma to achieve something before his term expires.”

-U Gambira, a leader of the All-Burma Monks’ Alliance that spearheaded nationwide protests in Burma in September---

—

U WIN TIN

Because we refuse to bow to these unjust election 'laws,' our party will be abolished by the regime soon. Still, the NLD will not disappear. We will be among the people, with the people. We will continue to fight for democracy, human rights and equality among all ethnic nationalities, by peaceful means. —

Win Tin, a member of NLD Central Executive Committee

From Stalin to Burma, a history lesson

They may wear different cloaks, but under the surface all dictators are similar. As the memory of dictators like Joseph Stalin fades, mistakes of the past repeat themselves with a vengeance in forgotten places like Burma.One writer said of Stalin: “He had found Russia working with wooden ploughs and left it equipped with atomic [stock]piles.” But perhaps the true question doesn’t regard Stalin’s undisputable impact on humanity, but whether the legacy justified all the human sacrifice. To Stalin, the millions killed as a consequence of his ambitious drive were simply stepping stones along the road to national prosperity. However, such a Machiavellian frame of mind can neither be justifiable nor ethical.Stalin utilized numerous harsh methods in attempting to meet his ‘utopian’ goals. Collective farms were prevalent, while each Five Year Plan sought to leapfrog Russia ahead of competing nations and systems. Toward this end, virtually every industry fell under the direct control of the government and its de facto and shackled workforce. And the sad truth, more often than not, was results never met by an increasingly impoverished population.Stalin’s principle instrument for maintaining control over his country was his secret police. Through this institution, fear was instilled in the hearts of the people. The final death toll from Stalin’s regime is indeed staggering, with estimates ranging from 10 to 20 million people having perished.Stalin was under the belief that all his actions, extreme or otherwise, were necessary in order to pull Russia into the industrial age. Yet, ultimately, the major flaw in Stalin’s reasoning was that he claimed all sacrifices were necessary and for the future of Russia. “Life has improved, comrades. Life has become more joyous,” he once remarked. And while he was thinking about the future of the country and the generations to come, the standard of living within Russia had plummeted.Today, forgetting that dictatorship is a self inflicted wound, some intellectuals and humanitarians reason that simply sending more aid and increasing engagement are starting points to improving the political situation in Burma. But when they begin to regard the active opposition, as symbolized by Aung San Suu Kyi, as increasingly irrelevant, the time has come to refresh their memory about Joseph Stalin and the enormous price of dictatorship. It is one thing to want to bring Burma into the international community, but it is another to coddle and nurture tyrants without speaking out against their inhumane acts.So far, newly elected U.S. President Barack Obama and Foreign Secretary Hillary Clinton have taken a cautious and slow approach toward Burma. But in a world of competing interests and ideology, it will be a great tragedy if they fail to take a firm stand against the dictators in Burma.After all, the United States and its allies helped reform the militaries in Indonesia and Turkey within democratic transitions and transformations. Now, the U.S., United Nations, ASEAN and the European Union need decisive and effective leadership to help Burma. Obama and Clinton have a great chance to seize this mantle…if they are willing to seriously take on the leadership role.Today, even as Burma’s generals tragically act more and more like Stalin, could it not be that the army as an institution in Burma was originally inspired by similar beliefs to those of countries such as Indonesia and Turkey? This should offer an important clue as to where to begin with Burma.

88 Generation Students (Exile)

Saturday, March 20, 2010

ဆရာၾကီးေခၚလို ႔ ေစ်းတင္ထားလိုက္တယ္

No comments:

NeoCounter

ONLINE COUNTER

VISITOR COUNTER

About Me